A Seamless Search Experience

Enhanced Product Discovery and Navigation, Reducing Friction by 27% and Increasing Engagement with a 4x Boost in Product Views

OVERVIEW

Reebonz’s search experience was redesigned to enhance product discoverability and streamline navigation. The new search system introduced persistent search functionality, service-specific filters, and a more intuitive search flow, eliminating friction and improving the efficiency of product discovery.

The results were impactful:

  • A 27% reduction in back-button clicks

  • A 4x increase in rental product views

  • A 47% boost in conversion rates.

MY ROLE
  • Improved search experience through UX/UI design

  • Conducted data-driven analysis to identify and solve key pain points

  • Enhanced search usability and optimized filtering systems

TOOL

Figma, Redash, Crazy Egg

TEAM

1 Product Manager
1 Product Designer
2 Engineers
1 Analytics

TIMELINE

September 2022 - February 2024
(12 Months)

CONTEXT

About Reebonz

Reebonz is an online platform offering three luxury services:

Reebonz Logo
Reebonz Logo
Reebonz Logo
Reebonz Logo
Reebonz Logo
Reebonz Logo

With such diverse offerings, optimizing the search experience was crucial to ensuring that users could quickly and accurately find their desired products.

PROBLEM DISCOVERY

Inefficient
Search Experience

Users struggled to edit their search terms, requiring repeated use of the back button, leading to frustration and abandonment.

Uneditable Search Bar in Result Page

Product Categorization Issues

Store, Rent, and Vintage items were mixed together, making it difficult for users to find the specific type of product they were looking for.

Mixed Products in Search Result Page

PROJECT GOAL

1.

Simplify search modification for a smoother user flow

2.

Providing service-specific search results for Store, Rent, and Vintage categories

PROJECT TASK I

Improving
Search Editing Process

PROBLEM

Barriers in Search Modification
Leading to User Frustration

1

Back-button clicks were 3x higher than other navigation actions, indicating inefficiencies in search terms modification.

2

The Back button did not provide a clear exit from search, functioning more like a browser back action. Instead of returning users to their previous page, it only reverted their most recent action, causing unintended friction.

APPROACH

Unified Search Header
Across Pages

The same search bar header was implemented across the search page, input field, and search results page, allowing users to modify their search directly on the results page without navigating elsewhere.

Enhancing
Back-Button Usability

After the improvement, the Back button now returns users directly to the previous page, enabling a faster and more intuitive search experience.

DESIGN DECISION

Refining
Back Button Behavior

Analyzing search navigation across multiple e-commerce platforms, I identified four major approaches to handling Back button interactions. Most platforms allowed users to exit search seamlessly instead of stepping back through each past action (Pattern 2).

Previously, our Back button functioned like a browser back action, requiring users to undo each modification one by one (Pattern 1). This created unnecessary friction, making it difficult to exit search efficiently.

To resolve this, I redesigned the Back button behavior to return users directly to their pre-search page, aligning with common UX patterns and improving navigation flow.

PROJECT TASK II

Optimizing
Filtering & Categorization

USER SEGMENTS & KEY INSIGHTS

Understanding User Needs
to Improve Search Efficiency

Understanding
User Needs

to Improve
Search Efficiency

Through user data analysis, three primary user types were identified:

Luxury Buyers

Prioritize brand and price, searching for specific products quickly.

01

Luxury Renters

Focus on rental availability and reservation type (subscription vs. one-time rental).

02

Vintage Buyers

Emphasize product condition and authenticity, making more deliberate purchase decisions.

03

PROBLEM

Search Results
Misaligned with User Needs

Search Results
Misaligned
with User Needs

65% of users reapplied product-type filters after initial searches, suggesting inefficiencies in categorization.

APPROACH

Making Service-Specific
Exploration Easier

1

Redesigned it into a fixed tab structure, allowing users to easily switch between Store, Rent, and Vintage.

2

Customized filters were introduced for each service: the Rent was refined with Reserve/Subscribe filters, while the Vintage category included Product Condition filters, enabling users to quickly find essential information.

DESIGN DECISION

Optimizing Service Tabs
for Intuitive Navigation

Optimizing
Service Tabs
for Intuitive Navigation

The initial design (V1) used an Integrated tab, grouping Store (new) and Vintage (pre-owned) products under 'Store' based on the assumption of shared purchase behavior.

V2 prioritized Store due to business data showing higher search volume for new products, removing Rent tabs in favor of a direct link to rental listings. However, heatmap analysis revealed strong rental search intent, prompting an iterative redesign (V3).

Further user research confirmed distinct browsing behaviors among Store, Rent, and Vintage users, leading to the final four-tab solution (V4): All, Rent, Vintage, and Store.

This structure elevated Rent as a top revenue category, improved Vintage discoverability, and used the All tab to encourage service exploration—enhancing both user experience and business alignment.

IMPACT

Reduced back-button clicks by 27%
Increased rental product views by 4x
Enhanced user interactions by 18%
Increased conversion rate by 47%

Increased multi-item orders
by 68%
Boosted cart-driven transactions
by 30%
Improved cart click-through rates
by 20%
Reduced checkout abandonment rates
by 15%

Back-Button Clicks

- 27%

- 27%

User Interactions

+ 18%

+ 18%

Conversion Rate

+ 47%

+ 47%

Key Takeaways

1

Data-Driven UX Enhancements
Yield Tangible Results

User behavior analysis allowed us to accurately identify key pain points and apply effective solutions. Combining both quantitative and qualitative data proved essential in optimizing the search experience!

2

Unexpected Outcomes
Require Further Analysis

While the initial goal was to improve the search experience, conversion rates increased by 47%, an unanticipated yet valuable outcome. Future projects should consider optimizing both the search and purchase journey in parallel.